They prove that, contrary to what that comment you linked says: 1. There is a WHCDC facility at the location claimed, close to the seafood market 2. There was

They prove that, contrary to what that comment you linked says: 1. There is a WHCDC facility at the location claimed, close to the seafood market 2. There was research on bats at the WHCDC In other words, the person who "thoroughly debunked" the paper just didn't have a clue where to look. I'm getting tired discussing this. The "lab escape hypothesis" is not a debunked conspiracy theory. It's a plausible scenario. Pathogens - including SARS-CoV-1 - have escaped from labs several times. The wildlife market transmission is a plausible scenario as well, it just seems "out of place" in Wuhan. That doesn't mean it's wrong, of course.