3 ms·
Having development in the US just means they'd have to be concerned about illicit US government interference. How is that an improvement? https://www.aclu.org
by thecureforzits 6y ago
Having development in the US just means they'd have to be concerned about illicit US government interference. How is that an improvement?
https://www.aclu.org/other/surveillance-under-usapatriot-act https://www.aclu.org/other/surveillance-under-usapatriot-act
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/earn-it-act-violates-constitution https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/earn-it-act-violates-c...
- kordlessagain 6y agoYou're a troll.
- dang 6y agoPlease don't break the site guidelines regardless of how bad another comment is or you feel it is. That only makes things worse. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- atonse 6y agoYes, and to the couple of my clients who are governments of AMERICAN cities, that answer is clear. (And that was my original premise). I am no cheerleader for NSA surveillance. People who know me in real life are probably tired of hearing me talk about it (and privacy/security in general).
- rimjongun 6y agoU.S. surveillance is ok if you're a US gov entity. Completely irrelevant to the question posed by GP.
- msla 6y agoIt's an improvement because it isn't nearly as pervasive as PRC interference.