4 ms·
> This is the cost of a profound lack of leadership. Paul O'Neill died recently (not COVID-19 related). I don't have many business heroes. O'Neill was one of t
by klenwell 6y ago
> This is the cost of a profound lack of leadership.
Paul O'Neill died recently (not COVID-19 related). I don't have many business heroes. O'Neill was one of the them. (Andrew Grove is the other.)
Here's how O'Neill turned ALCOA around when he took it over in the 80s:
A few minutes before noon, O'Neill took the stage. He was fifty-one years old, trim, and dressed in gray pinstripes and a red power tie. His hair was white and his posture military straight. He bounced up the steps and smiled warmly. He looked dignified, solid, confident. Like a chief executive.
Then he opened his mouth.
"I want to talk to you about worker safety," he said. "Every year, numerous Alcoa workers are injured so badly that they miss a day of work. Our safety record is better than the general American workforce, especially considering that our employees work with metals that are 1500 degrees and machines that can rip a man's arm off. But it's not good enough. I intend to make Alcoa the safest company in America. I intend to go for zero injuries."
The audience was confused. These meetings usually followed a predictable script: A new CEO would start with an introduction, make a faux self-deprecating joke--something about how he slept his way through Harvard Business School--then promise to boost profits and lower costs. Next would come an excoriation of taxes, business regulations, and sometimes, with a fervor that suggested firsthand experience in divorce court, lawyers. Finally, the speech would end with a blizzard of buzzwords--"synergy," "rightsizing," and "co-opetition"--at which point everyone could return to their offices, reassured that capitalism was safe for another day.
O'Neill hadn't said anything about profits. He didn't mention taxes. There was no talk of "using alignment to achieve a win-win synergistic market advantage." For all anyone in the audience knew, given his talk of worker safety, O'Neill might be pro-regulation. Or, worse, a Democrat. It was a terrifying prospect.
...
Within a year of O'Neill's speech, Alcoa's profits would hit a record high.
Here's an extended excerpt from Charles Duhigg's book, The Power of Habit: http://txti.es/duhigg-keystone-habits http://txti.es/duhigg-keystone-habits
Imagine a president who came out in February, even early March, with a message like that. Imagine our response had been organized around that message:
"I intend to keep all Americans safe, rich and poor, old and young. I intend to go for zero deaths."
- votepaunchy 6y ago> Imagine a president who came out in February, even early March, with a message like that ... Considering the virus was spreading in the US in late January any action at that time would have been much too late.
- crispyambulance 6y agoSouth Korea was hit with this virus at about the same time. In some ways they're more vulnerable than we are: higher percentage of older people, higher population density. They've been FAR BETTER at controlling this thing than the USA. The key difference? Leadership: they don't have a mental-case at the helm of their government. Trust: their populace heeded warnings and acted accordingly. I expect that when this is all over, we'll see that even some countries that have been referred to disparagingly as "banana republics" will outperform the USA in handling of the crisis.
- karmakaze 6y agoI agree with those two points and I think there are some others. Culture: (1) wearing masks was already socially accepted, (2) detail-oriented nature performing early full contact tracing by any means necessary even if manual; (3) big wake-up-call from a super-spreader.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]