Not only that. It's an awful precedent to shoot down any research based on the implementation of it. That's more than just a misunderstanding; it's a fundamenta

Not only that. It's an awful precedent to shoot down any research based on the implementation of it. That's more than just a misunderstanding; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of how research and scientific processes work. The issue claims the tests are broken because they're checking for checksums instead of actual data -- but what they really do is to check for the sanity of the implementation to be actually implementing the mathematical models that are underlying to it.