3 ms·
Next logical step would be having <youremail>+<secretKey>@gmail.com as the real email and <justyouremail>@gmail.com as spam box.
by NullPrefix 6y ago
Next logical step would be having <youremail>+<secretKey>@gmail.com as the real email and <justyouremail>@gmail.com as spam box.
- NotSammyHagar 6y agoThat is a great idea. I really want my email hosted some place and that I could write my own "post arrival" simple business logic.
- vageli 6y ago> That is a great idea. I really want my email hosted some place and that I could write my own "post arrival" simple business logic. You can do this in gmail with filters, unless I'm missing something about the use case.
- sneak 6y agohttps://anonaddy.me https://anonaddy.me I use this service a lot.
- drdeadringer 6y agoClearly you like them because you use them a lot. Anything about them you mislike?
- dorgo 6y agoMaybe it's too early, but I don't get it. If the spammer doesn't strip "+<secretKey>" then you get spam in your real inbox. Btw, what is so secret about the secretKey if you post it on the internet?
- NullPrefix 6y agoYou give different secretKey to each recipient. This way you know who leaked your email.