2 ms·
> What? What nrr is saying is simply: If someone replies to a comment and they have a human avatar, there was always a chance it was the output of https://www
by some_furry 6y ago
> What?
What nrr is saying is simply:
If someone replies to a comment and they have a human avatar, there was always a chance it was the output of https://www.thispersondoesnotexist.com https://www.thispersondoesnotexist.com
Their heuristic for "if it's a furry avatar, it's probably not from a Russian troll farm" is now invalid.
- URSpider94 6y agoOk, thank you (and no offense meant to the OP) that makes sense in an odd way, and I’m clearly just not up on these things. I wasn’t aware that the corresponding fake-person generator was a thing, but of course it is. There’s something odd about the fact that a cartoon rendering would be more trustworthy than a photo. Then again, there’s always been the joke about people who keep the sample photo that comes in the picture frame to pretend they have a s.o. or family ...