3 ms·
Yep, let's hope that becomes true - the last time I looked into[1] the situation, it seemed that the latest drafts have moved the settings back out of the brows
by jka 7y ago
Yep, let's hope that becomes true - the last time I looked into[1] the situation, it seemed that the latest drafts have moved the settings back out of the browser.
I contacted my MEP at the time about this, and please do the same if you can voice your support for simpler, genuinely user-friendly and consent-respecting settings.
[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21914283 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21914283
- Deukhoofd 7y agoIt's still there, page 27. They just refer to the browser as software providers, which is probably better, as it now covers internet software that is not technically a browser.
- jka 7y agoIt seems ambiguous to me - my concern/question is whether the definition of 'software settings' could include the content of a web page itself. That could lead us back to the current situation where consent dialogs are designed by advertising networks, and result in user consent fatigue.