5 ms·
You make it obvious and unambiguous so that if you argue your case in front of a judge they will agree with you. Same way as you demonstrate a paper consent for
by stubish 7y ago
You make it obvious and unambiguous so that if you argue your case in front of a judge they will agree with you. Same way as you demonstrate a paper consent form is valid.
- umvi 7y agoCompany: "User clearly consented. See? Here are the logs, here is the dialogue they were shown." Person: "I swear I didn't consent! I didn't even see the dialogue! My cat must've walked across the keyboard and accidentally consented" Ok, you're the judge, what's your call? Should the dialogue force you to have to type: "I've read and consent to the terms ..." ?
- kiba 7y agoThe laws are not about proposing some legal gottac based on inane ruling in clearly contrived scenarios.
- Leherenn 7y agoIf it was accidental (as in the form was clear, but my cat pressed the wrong button), then the user just needs to ask the company to remove the consent. If the company refuse, or if the user claims he was tricked into agreeing, then there is cause for further investigation. And it's not going to be a judge from the start, but whatever organism is charged with compliance. Then, if they have a case, a judge gets involved.
- zepto 7y agoI wonder what the compliance organism looks like?