3 ms·
I wouldn't get too spun up by an opinion piece designed to spin you up. But, since you asked: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-deaths-per-millio
by tomohawk 7y ago
I wouldn't get too spun up by an opinion piece designed to spin you up. But, since you asked:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-deaths-per-million-7-day-average?country=USA https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-deaths-per-mi...
- Retric 7y agoDead people don’t require medical attention. Flattening the curve is about hospitals getting overwhelmed even if similar numbers of people get sick and die either way. The difference between hypothetically 1 million deaths vs 1.2 million deaths makes a huge difference for 200,000 people.
- tomohawk 7y agoI have a family member working in a major metropolitan hospital. They are not overwhelmed. By all accounts, our state is at or past the peak, and we are not even close to being overwhelmed. Many doctors and nurses are actually out of work as "elective" procedures are on hold. Measuring the number of cases as the testing is being massively bumped out does not measure overload - actual death rate does.
- Retric 7y agoSpecific hospitals being overwhelmed or not is a different question. If we want to know how stressed the healthcare system is look at hospitalization rates, other proxy’s are pointless when you have hard data. Deaths don’t track 1:1 with hospitalizations because some people die much sooner. The most at risk tend to die within 2 weeks, while others are still extremely sick and can die 6+ weeks after infection. Those people have lower rates of death per day, but may still require ventilators. Thus, a steady rate of new infections can look like a very slow decrease in deaths even as the heath system is getting more stressed.
- tomohawk 7y agoAll I can say is that the data does not support a conclusion other than that the death rate has flattened for some time. The number of tests per 1000 people is increasing each day in the US. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/full-list-daily-covid-19-tests-per-thousand?time=2020-03-08..&country=USA https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/full-list-daily-covid-19-... This means that it is increasingly likely to uncover more cases, independent of how many new infections there actually are. Where is the data on overloaded hospitals?
- travisporter 7y agothe 7 day moving average means there is a lag in that curve for prediction. Incubation time of upto two weeks may not show itself for upto three weeks.
- tomohawk 7y agoIf you go to the site, they answer these concerns. The reporting is also delayed, and so can be very bursty. Here is the raw data, which shows a flatening. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/new-covid-deaths-per-million?tab=chart&time=2020-03-08..&country=USA https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/new-covid-deaths-per-mill...
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- mkl 7y agoThat's a graph of growth rate again, showing similar data to the article. That roughly flat growth rate means linear increase in total deaths, day by day. To be flattening that total curve, the growth rate needs to keep decreasing.
- tomohawk 7y agoIt is not a graph of growth rate. It is a graph of death rate, and it shows the death rate on a day-to-day basis is pretty much constant for a while. If we have pretty much the same deaths per 100000 from one day to the next, where is the growth?
- mkl 7y agoIt is a graph of the rate of change of the total number of deaths, in units deaths/day. I.e., the growth rate of the death count. The total number of deaths is approximately the area under the curve, so if the curve stays constant as time goes on, the total area (number of deaths) increases linearly.
- madengr 7y agoWell I take “growth” to be a “rate” (the velocity). So a “growth rate” would be acceleration. That death curve is now flat for the last two samples, implying the rate is zero. The graph should be labeled deaths/million/day, which means the acceleration is zero and the velocity is constant. Sorry, just drives me bonkers when the media tosses about words such as “the economy grew at a rate of ....”. I suppose English is more confusing with “Billy grew 10 cm” (implied over a year), compared with “Billy is growing 10 cm/year”.