2 ms·
That doesn't mean one can't read the preprint and critically evaluate it (I've done so for a few posted here on HN). On this specific paper, I think tracking s
by lbeltrame 6y ago
That doesn't mean one can't read the preprint and critically evaluate it (I've done so for a few posted here on HN).
On this specific paper, I think tracking survival is not the right metric. Studies which evaluate the time to recovery, like the NIAID trial with remedisivir, are far more important in the current situation.
- abalone 6y agoSure. You can critically evaluate random Internet posts. They are still problematic when they enter public non-specialist discourse without peer review by those that possess the experience and context to properly evaluate them.