I like the way you frame CT. Never got too deep down this rabbit hole, the terminology is just too atrocius. I wonder though how useful it is in practice. It is

I like the way you frame CT. Never got too deep down this rabbit hole, the terminology is just too atrocius. I wonder though how useful it is in practice. It is easier for me to take a formula and generalize it among one dimension at a time as the needs arise, see the catamorphism example above. As opposed to correctly divine 5-10-15 very specific concretizations of an uber-abstract scheme to arrive to the same result. Echoes of premature abstraction. Perhaps the world lacks CT for dummies. Teach it in primary school. New Math was not aggressive enough ;)