3 ms·
Would love to see how Safari handles your benchmark! I find it pretty fast, but maybe that's just bias because it treats my battery nice.
by simonklitj 6y ago
Would love to see how Safari handles your benchmark! I find it pretty fast, but maybe that's just bias because it treats my battery nice.
- leeoniya 6y agothere's an artificial 500ms delay in there between fake data gen and chart drawing so it's easier for me to isolate the two in the perf timeline :) > Would love to see how Safari handles your benchmark! i don't have access to a Mac, so you won't get this from me!
- simonklitj 6y agoFair enough! Thanks anyway, though.
- twhb 6y agoI ran three trials of each on a min spec 2019 MacBook Pro 16". All numbers are ms rounded to the nearest integer, all browsers are latest stable. I also loaded the page with dev tools closed since that affected times. Browser: (trial 1 prep, trial 1 chart), (trial 2 prep, trial 2 chart), (trial 3 prep, trial 3 chart) Chrome: (649, 347), (638, 343), (618, 358) Firefox: (353, 307), (358, 307), (361, 308) Safari: (281, 264), (287, 258), (309, 262)
- freediver 6y agoSimilar experience. Beating WebKit on macOS in rendering performance or energy use is very hard for both Chrome and Firefox (and the clones).
- simonklitj 6y agoVery interesting. Thanks a lot! Firefox did really well, that’s cool to see.