> Everyone knew that masks worked Well, that's disingenuous at best. There's still fierce debate as to whether it's worth the general public wearing masks. Pr

> Everyone knew that masks worked Well, that's disingenuous at best. There's still fierce debate as to whether it's worth the general public wearing masks. Pro life? Communism? You're really digging now. How about capitalism? Lots of people die because of capitalism. Shall we ban any debate about capitalism as well? Freedom of speech is one of those issues that will never be resolved because there are no clear boundaries. We all agree that there are some things that people should not say. That's why we have things like libel/slander laws. I'm sure you wouldn't like it if someone was going around trying to convince people that your father likes to give blow jobs to dobermans. You would, rightfully, want that person stopped. Is that suppression of freedom of speech? The question is: where does the boundary lie? This is where we have the debates. > Should we ban anyone who says that cell phones cause cancer? Possibly. The difference is we have not (to my knowledge) heard any stories of engineers being attacked because of this whereas there have been a number of stories in the news recently of engineers being afraid to go to work because of idiots attacking them because of these ludicrous coronavirus 5G stories.