4 ms·
The standard res screen on the XPS isn't high DPI at all. It's clearly inferior to a retina display for text and image rendering.
by foldr 7y ago
The standard res screen on the XPS isn't high DPI at all. It's clearly inferior to a retina display for text and image rendering.
- thomashobohm 7y agoI'm not going to engage in some arcane debate about the particularities of random windows laptops vs. apple ones. The fact is that there are comparable windows laptops at this point when it comes to "bezels and ports," in particular, but also when it comes to most things that make a laptop nice to use.
- foldr 7y agoI was just responding to your claim that the difference between the standard res screen and the 4k screen is unnoticeable. There’s a very easily noticeable difference between them, and the retina display on the MacBook Pro is much closer in quality to the 4k display. So it doesn’t make sense to compare the price of an XPS with a standard res screen to the price of a MacBook Pro with a retina screen. This is actually a paradigm example of Apple getting it right. Other manufacturers offer you a choice between a crappy low DPI display or an ultra high DPI display that drains your battery. Apple offer you a sensible compromise.
- jotm 7y agoI'm so getting downvoted for this, but let me just say it: the iPhone IPS not-even-FullHD displays are sad. The exact same inferiority you mention, in reverse -_-
- read_if_gay_ 7y agoWhy do you think "not-even-FullHD" is an issue if it passes the benchmark of not being able to see individual pixels? Higher resolutions than that aren't just pointless, they're counterproductive.
- Sangeppato 7y agoThe only important factor is Pixel density IMHO. And this is where Apple consistently get it right