3 ms·
Really? I mean I suppose that's one interpretation. I'm more just saying that some things are well understood, commonly agreed upon, fundamental, or at the very
by Pfhreak 7y ago
Really? I mean I suppose that's one interpretation. I'm more just saying that some things are well understood, commonly agreed upon, fundamental, or at the very least "settled for the time being". There must be things you'd say don't warrant giving both sides equal space.
- rglullis 7y agoYour strawman is on the fact that OP is not arguing for "always hearing both sides", and this is what you argued against. The point is that there are some comments that are being downvoted simply because they are the downvoter is not in agreement. And your totalitarian display is in the part where you indicate that anything that is not "commonly agreed upon" should be supressed instead of discussed or search for mutual understanding, i.e, "not deserving of space".