> this outweights the public health benefits or providing an alternative to cigarettes for adult cigarette addicts No way. It's not the e-cigs - those are vast

> this outweights the public health benefits or providing an alternative to cigarettes for adult cigarette addicts No way. It's not the e-cigs - those are vastly more helpful than harmful overall. It's Juul specifically - they're the bad player in the game. Not the only one, but the biggest of the handful - most e-cig companies just want to sell within the rules. No need to cut off the nose to spite the face. That would be detrimental.