"If the creator isn’t getting paid for you to watch, then it’s theft" Nonsense. In some cases it might be copyright infringement, but only a court can decide

"If the creator isn’t getting paid for you to watch, then it’s theft" Nonsense. In some cases it might be copyright infringement, but only a court can decide and only on a case-by-case basis. How else do we determine if a reproduction is fair use? "if the owner of the content is having their content used against their will, then you are violating their rights." That is not how copyrights work. Criticism and parody are allowed whether or not the copyright holder agrees to it, as are various forms of sampling to create new works. Again, whether or not a given act is infringing is something a court has to decide.