5 ms·
Guns rights advocates are less likely to live in cities, so this doesn't affect them. Besides, the people in cities are the ones who commonly vote to take away
by dx87 6y ago
Guns rights advocates are less likely to live in cities, so this doesn't affect them. Besides, the people in cities are the ones who commonly vote to take away gun rights, so it could be a case of "this is what they get for continually voting to take rights away".
- taborj 6y agoI disagree with your first part (gun rights advocates live everywhere, even if they're not as vocal), but I do agree with your second part (you reap what you sow). This is an effect of slowly giving up rights over the years.
- rmcpherson 6y agoWhich rights have been given up, specifically? Clearly not gun rights.
- EVdotIO 6y agoThe 4th.
- grimjack00 6y agoGiven up? Perhaps not. Greatly restricted? Definitely.
- taborj 6y agoWell, seeing as how the second amendment says "shall not be infringed", it could be argued that any law restricting arms ownership is in violation. In fact, you'll find many folks with that opinion.