4 ms·
> In the best case food was mediocre (mostly bread or porridge or similar) > The local nobles took every liberty with peasants: robbery, beatings as sport, rap
by eeZah7Ux 6y ago
> In the best case food was mediocre (mostly bread or porridge or similar)
> The local nobles took every liberty with peasants: robbery, beatings as sport, rape, murder. The roads between towns were plagued with bandits.
You are cherry-picking examples that are in no way representative of the life of most humans.
Plenty of evidence shows otherwise.
- jacobolus 6y agoMy “cherry picked examples” are the life stories of people I have personally met (and with high likelihood of your own ancestors and their neighbors within the past 150 years – certainly of my ancestors ~5 generations ago who were European peasants). It obviously wasn’t the case that every peasant was raped and then murdered by a local lord, but such violence was common and a constant threat. Rural peasants were and are typically a foot shorter than people living in wealthy industrialized countries today (or people in hunter–gatherer tribes for that matter). Almost all of their calories come from staple starches, which they supplement as best they can. Periods of extreme hunger are common enough that most peasants experienced them at least a few times over a lifetime. What kind of good nutrition do you think people have/had? Life expectancy was under 40 years old. Even life expectancy after age 5 was pretty short.