5 ms·
That is not a Neruda poem. It is apocryphal. Pablo,ever the communist, would have never written such a piece of libertarian crap.I am surprised that such a fa
by cambalache 7y ago
That is not a Neruda poem. It is apocryphal. Pablo,ever the communist, would have never written such a piece of libertarian crap.I am surprised that such a fan of Neruda as you claim to be did not notice that.
- felipemnoa 7y agoI was about to share it with people claiming it was from Neruda. I did a bit of searching and it appears that it is indeed apocryphal. Thanks for saving me the embarrassment.
- AndrewUnmuted 7y agoNot surprised to see such a salty reply from a Neruda fan.
- cambalache 7y agoI am not a particular fan of Neruda (I prefer Vallejo,Ramos Sucre or Machado), so save your snarky comment.
- Igelau 7y agoSavage burn. Their True Neruda Fan Score is never going to recover from that one.
- highlysyntropic 7y agoPerhaps you in your limited understanding of communism, fed to your by your propagandist overlords to control you, have failed to understand how someone could hold both views. Or maybe you just don't get people. multitudes. Either way, it's a fact. Protip: this is the part where you see reality and update your perspective
- jrochkind1 7y agoI barely know anything about Neruda, and i was thinking... geez, I thought he was known as a good poet, did he really write that garbage? Maybe it lost something in translation? Whether you 'agree' with what it's apparently didactically trying to say or not, that's just a bad poem.
- tsm 6y ago> Maybe it lost something in translation? Native Spanish speaker here, and the original text is just as lackluster