FWIW, my stance is that there is way too little information to draw any conclusion with sufficient conviction. This is a highly politicised issue so the bar for

FWIW, my stance is that there is way too little information to draw any conclusion with sufficient conviction. This is a highly politicised issue so the bar for proving something is, imo, higher. The post I was replying too had high conviction in the 'lab-grown' theory. I'm not sure what you mean by 'non-scientific' reasons.