3 ms·
The main source would be the website of his own research center https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/en/ https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/en/ (but it's
by pnako 6y ago
The main source would be the website of his own research center
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/en/ https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/en/ (but it's mostly the content in French that's interesting)
He had a lengthy interview on French media last week.
As far as I'm concerned he got pretty much every part of that epidemic right from the beginning and the facts are now vindicating him.
But that's not really the point anyway. My point is: he went against the WHO and the French government. And at least some people, like me, find value in what he is saying. So who is to judge whether or not he should be allowed to spread his ideas?
- zimpenfish 6y ago> So who is to judge whether or not he should be allowed to spread his ideas? People who don't think you should make up stuff in medical studies? Which he has a documented history of doing. Or people who don't think a half-arsed study of questionable value should be held up as a breakthrough against COVID-19 when it demonstrably is not?