3 ms·
The Apollo program was a stunt. You can say that it took a man to land on the moon, because NASA wasn’t capable of building a robot to do it. But the Russians
by blackrock 7y ago
The Apollo program was a stunt. You can say that it took a man to land on the moon, because NASA wasn’t capable of building a robot to do it.
But the Russians were able to achieve this a few years later with their moon rover. Although it was more of a dumb luck gravity drop, and hope you don’t land on a cliff, and topple over and die.
Then, the Chinese were able to do it, with an even more sophisticated robot, that was able to make automatic landing decisions like a human. This is the ultimate moon lander.
Given the choice between humans vs. robots, I’d take a robot any day, to land myself on the moon. You don’t have to worry about pesky humans making emotional life or death decisions in the heat of the moment, and jeopardizing your mission.
- xiphias2 7y agoOf course, me too, that's why I don't see the huge deal of a human being put on the spaceship after the necessary level of safety of the robot has been met. 50 years ago it was a huge deal, now I see it only as great engineering.
- jbay808 7y agoThe Russians soft-landed a robot on the moon before Apollo. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_programme https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_programme NASA also landed Surveyor.