3 ms·
I love Hatcher's book so I can't disagree with you. (Although he does have a section on category theory in chapter 2, but never revisits it again). But doing an
by WoahNoun 6y ago
I love Hatcher's book so I can't disagree with you. (Although he does have a section on category theory in chapter 2, but never revisits it again). But doing anything with sheaves and schemes without categories would feel a lot like doing linear algebra without matrix notation and just using lots of double sums. I also have a copy of JP May's a Concise course in Algebraic Topology next to me and I also love the presentation there. (Although I would absolutely never want to use that book as a first course haha. Hatcher is a classic for a reason.)
Being slightly facetious here as obviously Griffiths and Harris uses sheaves extensively and no category theory.
- spekcular 6y agoYeah, I totally agree. It's just I see a lot of category hype on here and I want to yell that it's mostly just linguistic! It's not some deep or scary thing. The analogy to matrix notation is really good.
- WoahNoun 6y agoOh yea, the computer science side of things seems to rename anything related to abstract algebra as "category theory."