I am but more broadly the movement toward legalism and the ad-hoc justifications wrapped around it. Cutting to the chase... You have been describing disparate

I am but more broadly the movement toward legalism and the ad-hoc justifications wrapped around it. Cutting to the chase... You have been describing disparate impact as a philosophical principle in and of itself. Whereas, in reality, disparate impact exists as a matter of political expediency. Its not a doctrine that should be adopted. Its one that may be necessary to adopt when real intentions and real motives are concealed.