The post makes a number of claims that I disagree with generally, like the idea that a person who is not a formal expert on a subject has no business offering e

The post makes a number of claims that I disagree with generally, like the idea that a person who is not a formal expert on a subject has no business offering evidence-based opinions on the subject. I think a link to the original paper would help me better judge where the author is coming from and whether, in context, he/she is making good points here.