No. Please no. There's no need for this. The reasoning behind this is because some people occasionally forget to include the `f` prefix? Then there's this: >S

No. Please no. There's no need for this. The reasoning behind this is because some people occasionally forget to include the `f` prefix? Then there's this: >Smith would add a new "p" string prefix for plain strings, which would behave like ordinary strings today. So what happens when reports start rolling in when some people occasionally forget to include the `p` prefix?