4 ms·

So which is it guys? 1) It was man-made, and biologically engineered in a lab. It escaped containment. 2) It came into being because the Chinese eat bats. So

So which is it guys? 1) It was man-made, and biologically engineered in a lab. It escaped containment. 2) It came into being because the Chinese eat bats. So China should shut down the wet markets. Because it cannot be both. The Trump Regime is lying and talking out of their asses, to cover up their own incompetence. And they are saying that it is both. And the American public are so gullible, that they’re believing everything Trump’s henchmen are saying (or at least his supporters are). Perhaps a more plausible theory, is that it really did emerge naturally from some random mutation in nature. And the Chinese were the first to detect it. The Lancet published back in January [1], a theory that the virus had no connection to the Wuhan Seafood Market, this was just coincidence that some early patients had gone there. Thus, the virus existed, before it got to the seafood market. The interesting new info, is that the French are now saying that they detected their first case back in December 27, 2019, after reviewing old case files [2]. This was 4 days before China published to the W.H.O. about the possibility of a new novel coronavirus. How is this even possible? Did the virus just magically hop on a plane in December? [1] https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market... [2] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/03/french-politicians-row-lockdown-restrictions-can-eased/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/03/french-politicia... Edit: If you’re going to downvote me, then provide some counter evidence to prove me wrong.

jml7c5 7y ago
Just a note: a call to stop the sale of "bush meat" in wet markets is not dependent on how this outbreak started. AFAIK the practice has been considered a disease risk for some time. While obviously the pressure to do something is much stronger now, that pressure would remain even if the outbreak was conclusively shown to be unrelated, given public awareness of just how disastrous a pandemic really is. >The Trump Regime is lying and talking out of their asses, to cover up their own incompetence. And they are saying that it is both. And the American public are so gullible, that they’re believing everything Trump’s henchmen are saying (or at least his supporters are). Please limit the partisanship. The point you're making can be expressed in a way that is less vitriolic and more open to meeting of minds.
LargoLasskhyfv 7y ago
Have you read http://chinamediaproject.org/2020/01/27/dramatic-actions/ http://chinamediaproject.org/2020/01/27/dramatic-actions/ ? Given the long incubation time, and large number of asymptomatic carriers, and global flights for all sorts of reasons i see no contradiction in the timeline. What got diagnosed early on was just the tip of the iceberg, from some cases developing serious symptoms. Furthermore: 1st case/patient zero=Stall operator from the seafood market... Does anybody know WHICH sort of stall he operated? Maybe he delivered test animals (in)to the lab, and got infected that way?

jml7c5 7y ago

Just a note: a call to stop the sale of "bush meat" in wet markets is not dependent on how this outbreak started. AFAIK the practice has been considered a disease risk for some time. While obviously the pressure to do something is much stronger now, that pressure would remain even if the outbreak was conclusively shown to be unrelated, given public awareness of just how disastrous a pandemic really is. >The Trump Regime is lying and talking out of their asses, to cover up their own incompetence. And they are saying that it is both. And the American public are so gullible, that they’re believing everything Trump’s henchmen are saying (or at least his supporters are). Please limit the partisanship. The point you're making can be expressed in a way that is less vitriolic and more open to meeting of minds.

LargoLasskhyfv 7y ago

Have you read http://chinamediaproject.org/2020/01/27/dramatic-actions/ http://chinamediaproject.org/2020/01/27/dramatic-actions/ ? Given the long incubation time, and large number of asymptomatic carriers, and global flights for all sorts of reasons i see no contradiction in the timeline. What got diagnosed early on was just the tip of the iceberg, from some cases developing serious symptoms. Furthermore: 1st case/patient zero=Stall operator from the seafood market... Does anybody know WHICH sort of stall he operated? Maybe he delivered test animals (in)to the lab, and got infected that way?