I don't know about results beyond the Stanford study, but they were talking about 4-5% as a highest estimate of those who had had it, which is indeed an order o

I don't know about results beyond the Stanford study, but they were talking about 4-5% as a highest estimate of those who had had it, which is indeed an order of magnitude off. The NYC study is interesting; of course, it's a random sample of people at grocery stores and community centers i.e. "those who are out and about in a pandemic", not a truly random sample. But it's intriguing nonetheless. Still, I'm not sure what the course of action that it supposedly suggests is: make everywhere in the USA 3x as infected as NYC at its peak? That's 40K more dead there and I doubt that the extrapolation to the rest of the country would be fun.