3 ms·

Yes, my systems are primarily operated for my benefit. This should not be a controversial stance, and certainly not one worth hurling insults about. >Seriously

Yes, my systems are primarily operated for my benefit. This should not be a controversial stance, and certainly not one worth hurling insults about. >Seriously - don’t use it if you hate it so much. Oh how I WISH that were a viable option. Few things would make me happier than that overcomplicated, opinionated, arrogant pile of unsafe code being excised viscera ex machnia from any system I have the misfortune of managing. Sadly I'm stuck with it if I want to run any mainstream Linux distros.

CountSessine 7y ago
Sadly I'm stuck with it if I want to run any mainstream Linux distros. Boohoo! Then man-up and look at all the alternatives out there! You can boot a Linux system with a simple 5-line shell script as /bin/init if you want! You clearly don’t care much about desktop Linux, because those of us that do don’t want a hundred rogue clipboard processes running in the background after we log out. Build a server box with Linux from scratch!
cycloptic 7y ago
What benefit are you really getting from using mainstream distros if you find their choices to be so objectionable and don't agree with their decisions? And have you looked at the state of the kernel or at your CPU lately? I would really suggest not using Linux or any modern x86_64 processor if you are worried about "overcomplicated, opinionated, arrogant piles of unsafe code" at the lowest possible levels of your system.
- dTal 7y ago
  >What benefit are you really getting from using mainstream distros if you find their choices to be so objectionable and don't agree with their decisions? Well, that's an easy one: popularity = support. I dislike Ubuntu these days, but I run LTS on my work machines because no matter what obscure program I might need in the course of my job, it will almost certainly run on Ubuntu. Build instructions will target Ubuntu. Prebuilt .debs will target Ubuntu. Static binaries, or AppImages, will have been tested on Ubuntu. I get a choice between "install the snap, or build from source?" I can install the snap and get on with my day. It's not inherently better in a technical sense, it's just overwhelmingly easier to swim with the current.

CountSessine 7y ago

Sadly I'm stuck with it if I want to run any mainstream Linux distros. Boohoo! Then man-up and look at all the alternatives out there! You can boot a Linux system with a simple 5-line shell script as /bin/init if you want! You clearly don’t care much about desktop Linux, because those of us that do don’t want a hundred rogue clipboard processes running in the background after we log out. Build a server box with Linux from scratch!

cycloptic 7y ago

What benefit are you really getting from using mainstream distros if you find their choices to be so objectionable and don't agree with their decisions? And have you looked at the state of the kernel or at your CPU lately? I would really suggest not using Linux or any modern x86_64 processor if you are worried about "overcomplicated, opinionated, arrogant piles of unsafe code" at the lowest possible levels of your system.

dTal 7y ago
>What benefit are you really getting from using mainstream distros if you find their choices to be so objectionable and don't agree with their decisions? Well, that's an easy one: popularity = support. I dislike Ubuntu these days, but I run LTS on my work machines because no matter what obscure program I might need in the course of my job, it will almost certainly run on Ubuntu. Build instructions will target Ubuntu. Prebuilt .debs will target Ubuntu. Static binaries, or AppImages, will have been tested on Ubuntu. I get a choice between "install the snap, or build from source?" I can install the snap and get on with my day. It's not inherently better in a technical sense, it's just overwhelmingly easier to swim with the current.