3 ms·

These days if configured correctly there is not a huge amount of difference in performance between nginx and Apache. I have stayed with Apache because I know it

These days if configured correctly there is not a huge amount of difference in performance between nginx and Apache. I have stayed with Apache because I know it and dealing with a http server is about 0.1% of my job.

Symbiote 6y ago
Exactly the same for me. Milliseconds really don't matter for internal tools or legacy or low-use external websites. If someone wants to see our financial report from 2005, I'm sure they're happy to wait the extra 300ms to download it from a static site on the other side of the world. They should be happy that the link to it in the 2006 document they have still works. (The Apache server listens on 4 ports, to support redirecting various 2000s-era CMSs to their replacements.) We also have some small but important sites using obscure Apache features (semantic web stuff). I have no idea if Nginx supports the necessary configuration, but since I spend 1-2 hours per year dealing with either scenario -- usually to 'archive' another site -- I'm quite happy to use Apache.