3 ms·
A common parts library supported by multiple EDAs would be nice indeed. But its pretty hard to pull of, since the library organization and styles are quite diff
by rnestler 6y ago
A common parts library supported by multiple EDAs would be nice indeed. But its pretty hard to pull of, since the library organization and styles are quite different between these.
I mean: Importing / exporting the geometry data of footprints and symbols shouldn't be too hard. But one also needs to find a common set of categories, tags, relations between the parts, etc. Otherwise one will end up with a huge library which is impossible to navigate.
Also I would be afraid to just create yet another format which will lead to even more fragmentation.