A good point. If my goal is educational (and it 2/3 is), these stupid short names are a huge oversight. I honestly didn't think about it much. I think I starte

A good point. If my goal is educational (and it 2/3 is), these stupid short names are a huge oversight. I honestly didn't think about it much. I think I started from known Haskell names, some conventions that I may have absorbed from catlab.jl and other places, and some unthoughtful accidents. I really really wanted id to be the identity, but I'm pretty sure it's a python keyword. I added a d and vowed to never speak of it again. Ever written a program about schools and had to use the variable Klass? I don't feel too bad about mplus and mzero. It's still pretty clear that they are something like plus and zero, but the m gives you pause. And it should, since in one case mplus is in fact multiplication. If this was rolled out into a library maybe I'd have both long and short names? I'd never want a library to have only long names for really common things. cod and dom don't actually give me a seconds pause. I like them having the same length too. Makes code prettier and easier to read. I also intend to replace some things with operators which would be even more inscrutable to a newcomer. @ has to be compose for example (to mimic numpy).