To be clear I think that being unemployed, in of itself, isn't sufficient reason to bring lawsuit. But, as stated in the video, if unemployed status is a suita

To be clear I think that being unemployed, in of itself, isn't sufficient reason to bring lawsuit. But, as stated in the video, if unemployed status is a suitable proxy for a protected group then its a problem. So it has to live in some context. People can use whatever metric they want for hiring, IMO. But when the metric is used as a means to get around other laws then its a problem (for example, a bank saying, "We won't hire people that listen to Lil Wayne"). I thought that's what the crux of the argument was about from the video.