3 ms·
Maybe look at F# for something .net compatible. Personally its use in some contexts, particularly those using the F# type providers has served me well. I also
by vizzier 6y ago
Maybe look at F# for something .net compatible. Personally its use in some contexts, particularly those using the F# type providers has served me well.
I also prefer to use FSX scripts over CSX in contexts where that is useful. I find my deeper knowledge of the .net infrastructure easier to leverage than having to learn powershell but FSX syntax also cleaner for scripting.
- platz 6y agoI'm generally an FP advocate but F# on the CLR has always been an uphill battle in terms of development of the language (especially lately) and providing a compelling case to outsiders to spend resources on F# over C#.
- JamesBarney 6y agoI've used f#. Type providers were really cool. And I like how terse it is but I feel like the gap is narrowing, and I couldn't ever use it on a real project. I'd feel guilty building a project for a client that is supportable by a tenth the number of developers without very good reason.