6 ms·
Gmail Unveils Another Weapon Against Email Overload: Smart Labels
- aresant 16y ago~5% of the average population is on Gmail, with 43%+ of users out there still stuck in Outlook. I always wonder why we don't see a more concerted effort to build a dead-simple email prioritizer / labeler for Outlook. Outlook has decent extension management features - Xobni has made some inroads but I feel like it addresses a much more complex set of needs and is unweildy for solving this basic problem. Microsoft made a somewhat interesting attempt w/their "email prioritizer" extension in MS Labs but they killed it rather quickly and I haven't seen much progress in releases that are managable / simple enough for the average user. So amongst all the hackers of hacker news is anybody working on a project along these lines? email prioritizer ref: http://lifehacker.com/#!400639/email-prioritizer-adds-pause-button-auto+ranking-to-email http://lifehacker.com/#!400639/email-prioritizer-adds-pause-... 43% ref : http://litmus.com/resources/email-client-stats http://litmus.com/resources/email-client-stats
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- Semiapies 16y agoAfter I realized that Outlook's built-in filtering had a ridiculously low circa-1985 limit to its code, I just built a Python script to file things in my inbox. I haven't bothered making it user-friendly or "smart", however - it just goes by rules expressed in a yaml file.
- neovive 16y agoI like the idea of making it easier for everyone to use labels and filters. I couldn't imagine using Gmail without custom filters -- especially for notifications. This should be very useful for those using Gmail. Is this available for Google Apps customers?
- joshkaufman 16y agoYes - just enabled it in my Google Apps account. You need to have Labs enabled.
- zacharycohn 16y agoAbout a year ago I set up a series of about 10 filters that essentially do the same function. This is definitely a useful Lab for people who don't want to spend 30 minutes setting up their own custom system.
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoWhy link to TechCrunch, why not link to the original source, as requested in the guidelines? Look, here is a submission to the actual Google blog post: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2305782 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2305782
- philfreo 16y agoI saw this on TechCrunch, thought it was cool, and posted it; they didn't link to the original Gmail blog source, so I figured they just found the feature on their own.
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoThat's the thing about TechCrunch - it's often a content-free wrap around an article that they then conveniently fail to reference.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]