Certainly it's not _completely_ different, though it does largely neuter the editorializing that is a main point of the article. What really happened here is a

Certainly it's not _completely_ different, though it does largely neuter the editorializing that is a main point of the article. What really happened here is a judge orders an agency to comply with the freedom of information act because the agency had not made a sufficient case that it was exempted from doing so in this instance. Doesn't address who is right about the "fakeness" question.