4 ms·
A lot of discussion about the demise of Flash is focused on how CSS and JavaScript can now create equally pretty-looking websites, which is fair enough. But tak
by transmit101 16y ago
A lot of discussion about the demise of Flash is focused on how CSS and JavaScript can now create equally pretty-looking websites, which is fair enough. But take it from a long-time audio developer: HTML5 audio is essentially useless for creating web applications involving almost any kind of audio. Even Firefox, which has the best HTML5 support so far, offers absolutely nothing like what is possible using the combination of a Flash client and a dedicated streaming server.
Flash might have a lot of bad points (which I'd be the first to call out) but RTMP audio (which also handles both video and arbitrary data) really isn't its worst feature, and for this reason alone its going to be a significant part of the internet for many years to come.
- Derbasti 16y agoI totally agree that for video/audio players, Flash is a good technology (if hardware support is enabled and Flash is properly sandboxed). Flash is platform independant, needs no pre-installed codecs and can be easily blocked. None of this is true for any native audio/video tag.
- aufreak3 16y agoNot quite true. If you look at audio in HTML only through the lens of the <audio> tag, you're right. Some of the work-in-progress JS audio API stuff that doesn't depend on the audio tag rocks, even right now, in the dev builds. The future looks brighter than ever without Flash imo. http://chromium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/audio/index.html http://chromium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/audio/index... edit: The in-progress spec - http://chromium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/audio/specification/specification.html http://chromium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/audio/speci...