> The implication was that the vast majority of criticism is methodically wrong. My point was in a completely different direction. My statement is that the tri

> The implication was that the vast majority of criticism is methodically wrong. My point was in a completely different direction. My statement is that the tribe I care about has very low standards for what constitute valid criticism. Together with my personal emotional reaction of this being sad and disheartening because I always assume my tribe was better than that. Matters of majority/minority are inconsequential for this point, (they can be relevant to other points) my point is that those criticism that are fruit of blatant lies are not discarded, as if people did not care that they are false.