4 ms·
The original title is "Judge Orders FCC to Hand Over IP Addresses Linked to Fake Net Neutrality Comments"! Removing "Fake" makes it sound like a completely diff
by rambojazz 6y ago
The original title is "Judge Orders FCC to Hand Over IP Addresses Linked to Fake Net Neutrality Comments"! Removing "Fake" makes it sound like a completely different thing.
- rasengan 6y agoAgreed, and that original title is the actual title of the linked article itself.
- lucb1e 6y agoFor what it's worth, I understood what was meant with the current title. Not saying it shouldn't be added, but for me it was OK.
- OrgNet 6y agoThis was probably done because of the (draconian) character limit imposed by HN on post titles... If it was me I would have removed the middle "e" in Addresses to comply.... aka Addrsses
- unishark 6y agoCertainly it's not _completely_ different, though it does largely neuter the editorializing that is a main point of the article. What really happened here is a judge orders an agency to comply with the freedom of information act because the agency had not made a sufficient case that it was exempted from doing so in this instance. Doesn't address who is right about the "fakeness" question.