This is neat. My first reaction was confusion and a bit of shock. But then it made sense. And it makes a lot of sense. Part of the issue is that “==“ and “is”

This is neat. My first reaction was confusion and a bit of shock. But then it made sense. And it makes a lot of sense. Part of the issue is that “==“ and “is” are intermixed. That emphasizes the weirdness but detracts from understanding the underlying mechanism that is at work. If you look at True == False == False It makes more a bit sense that it evaluates the way it does. If you do 1 == 2 == 2 and it evaluates to False, then it is perfectly clear.