4 ms·
The claim wasn’t that C++ is Turing complete, that’s trivially true. The claim was that C++’s grammar is Turing complete. I don’t know if that’s exactly the rig
by wtetzner 6y ago
The claim wasn’t that C++ is Turing complete, that’s trivially true. The claim was that C++’s grammar is Turing complete. I don’t know if that’s exactly the right way to phrase it, but C++’s template expansion stuff is Turing complete.
- battery_cowboy 6y agoIt was a weird phrasing to me, but i get what you were all saying now.