3 ms·
I don't understand where you are going with this. Can you show me that contact tracing can make significant difference? If not, then I won't consider the other
by searchableguy 7y ago
I don't understand where you are going with this. Can you show me that contact tracing can make significant difference? If not, then I won't consider the other points as they are simply irrelevant. Without the setu app being mandatory, going by government figures (which I doubt somewhat), only about 1.2k people have died so far.
I will consider that as a starting point and compare this to all the unnecessary deaths that happen in the country which government blatantly ignores.
And we still spend 3.6% of the total GDP on the healthcare so not really good. Could be anecdote but I am seeing less specialists in india and more dentists, dermatologist, and cosmetics.
Government hospitals are still unhygienic where I live so I won't even consider going there.
- sbmthakur 7y ago> Without the setu app being mandatory, going by government figures (which I doubt somewhat), only about 1.2k people have died so far. That's probably because we are in a strict lockdown which is not sustainable. The real effect of contract-tracing will be only be known when the economy is fully opened.
- ben_w 7y ago> Can you show me that contact tracing can make significant difference? It’s a standard technique that has been successfully used for a long time. For example, it’s how smallpox was finally wiped out. (This is a separate point to “does this particular app look suspicious?” to which I say “yes”). > going by government figures (which I doubt somewhat), only under 1k people have died so far. In India, which is doing the things you’re complaining about. Meanwhile, the USA, which has less than a quarter of India’s population, has 65,605. Are you familiar with exponential growth, or do you only ever see the word “exponential” used to mean “rapid” without the strict mathematical meaning?