I agree that a citation is needed ;) But in this case I think the case history points to OP being right, though you'd likely have to have a pretty egregious an

I agree that a citation is needed ;) But in this case I think the case history points to OP being right, though you'd likely have to have a pretty egregious and clear pattern of such activity, and it would have to be deemed material information: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-capitalone-insidertrading-idUSKCN0UR2KR20160114 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-capitalone-insidertra...