4 ms·
I wonder, should this terrible idea actually move forward, if console.log() would be a viable replacement for using alert(). This would kill two birds with one
by thisisblurry 16y ago
I wonder, should this terrible idea actually move forward, if console.log() would be a viable replacement for using alert().
This would kill two birds with one stone: the first being the annoyance of constant alerts and the second being a faster death to (older versions) of IE since they can't handle console.log without using extra JavaScript.
Hilarious implementation in the link though :)