61 ms·
Actually they somewhat did: "Spitznagel included a chart in his letter showing that a portfolio invested 96.7% in the S&P 500 and 3.3% in Universa’s fund would
by markvdb 6y ago
Actually they somewhat did:
"Spitznagel included a chart in his letter showing that a portfolio invested 96.7% in the S&P 500 and 3.3% in Universa’s fund would have been unscathed in March, a month in which the U.S. equity benchmark fell 12.4%. The same portfolio would have produced a compounded return of 11.5% a year since March of 2008 versus 7.9% for the index."
This seems to suggest they needed to include the bad 2008-2009 time to come out looking better than just plain dca etf investing...
- brenden2 6y agoThe way it's worded is very confusing to me. Kind of seems like they're trying to hide the fact that they underperform. I imagine once they take out their performance fees (usually 2% per year plus 20% when they exceed the benchmark) those gains aren't as impressive.
- paulpauper 6y agoyeah but you would have a capital gains tax on that option trade