>without ubiquitous, cheap, fast, and accurate testing No one is arguing to do more contact tracing and stop building testing capacity. You need both. False po

>without ubiquitous, cheap, fast, and accurate testing No one is arguing to do more contact tracing and stop building testing capacity. You need both. False positives are a big issue and should be reduced. but I don't see how having a better idea of which asymptomatic people to test would be a net negative on the whole?