Article critiques data set and gives zero details on the CDC calculation methodology, and provides zero relevance to any new or interesting data analysis, but

Article critiques data set and gives zero details on the CDC calculation methodology, and provides zero relevance to any new or interesting data analysis, but it surely mentioned Trump a few times. A simple Google search will provide you with actual data sets, nationally, state wide, and even globally, by very competent scientists, some of whom have studied this specifically for decades. There are various places you can research for example: FluView, FluMomo, Virologic Surveillance, Journal of Infectious Diseases, etc. I recently read, Influenza-attributable deaths, Canada 1990–1999 Published online by Cambridge University Press , so this MD's Scientific American blog post comes across as pure garbage.