3 ms·
The basis of his argument seems to be a character attack. There is no addressing of science in his argument, just "some people have a motive to lie to you, the
by aswanson 18y ago
The basis of his argument seems to be a character attack. There is no addressing of science in his argument, just "some people have a motive to lie to you, therefore global warming does not exist". Can't you see the logical flaw in that?
- Prrometheus 18y agoMost books by skeptics of the current order are simply dismissed. Lomborg's book caused a huge stir precisely because it was so packed full of data. It's really a masterpiece (though a bit dated now, it was written around 2001 or so).
- mattmaroon 18y agoRight, in 2001 it was probably good to be skeptical. 7 or 8 years of data in favor of the "humans are causing climate change" argument has come in since then.