3 ms·
Absolutely. The general quality and of course objectivity of WSJ has gone downhill for years. It’s not a recent phenomenon.
by dannyw 7y ago
Absolutely. The general quality and of course objectivity of WSJ has gone downhill for years. It’s not a recent phenomenon.
- souterrain 7y agoIn this case though, one would assume zero objectivity from any paper. The piece referenced is editorial.
- paulgb 7y agoKind of a lazy one, though. And I say this as a WSJ subscriber who regularly finds the editorials worth reading even when I disagree with them. In this case, it's just knee-jerk anti-anti-capitalism without bothering to understand the nuances of the situation.